Accountancy Age blog: Risky Business with Martin Williams, MD, Graydon UK Accountancy Age blog: Risky Business with Martin Williams, MD, Graydon UK A blog from Accountancy Age

« HIGH STREET WOES CONTINUE | Main | Gordon Ramsay fined by Companies House »

BOOTS kick suppliers in the teeth?

As a result of the 2006 merger between Boots and Alliance Unichem, the Integration finance board of the new group announced a few weeks ago that it will be standardising  UK payment terms for invoices for any goods or services purchased after 1st April 2008. Good news for suppliers then? Nope- these new terms will be 75 days from the end of the month of invoice, and will further provide for the application of a settlement discount of 2.5% of the invoice value if settled promptly.For a supplier that has been paid in say 45 days in the past, turning over 10 million pounds in sales to Boots per annum, the additional average amount outstanding will be 1,234 million. Assuming the cost of credit from banks is 7%, then the cost of funding the additional credit will be 86, 000 GBP.

Boots says that its procurement strategies are in line with other groups of similar size and scale. True- Debenhams, Robert Dyas, Selfridges, BHS and B&Q amongst others have all arbitrarily enforced less attractive payment terms onto their trade suppliers in recent times in what now has become a bit of a stampede by giant retailers to flex their buyer muscle. Has anyone got any advice for trade suppliers in these circumstances?   

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blogs-1.gos.vnu.net/mt-tb.cgi/84069

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference BOOTS kick suppliers in the teeth?.

Comments

Presumably, if you are a valued supplier and do not have a supply contract covering this change in terms you will object and negotiate a better payment deal. The individual buyer for the product supplied will, no doubt, have a limited amount of time he can spend on the issue of payment terms when it comes to fulfilling store supply chains.

I am sure Boots (and the others) will not be advertising any exceptions done quite so publicly.

We have been strong with Boots, orders have been on hold for two weeks+. We may lose the business, but with the margins boots requires and their new terms, its uncommercial to continue.

We dont want to lose the business, if we do we will re-submit our products in a few months on our terms/margins.

Post a comment

Useful links: About | Privacy policy | Terms & conditions | Top of the page
© Incisive Media Ltd. 2008
Incisive Media Limited, Haymarket House, 28-29 Haymarket, London SW1Y 4RX, is a company registered in the United Kingdom with company registration number 04038503